History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. State
163 N.W.2d 8
Wis.
1968
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Connor T. Hansen having taken no part in the decision upon this writ of error to review the judgment and the other members of the court being equally divided on the question of whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice Hallows, Mr. Justice Wilkie, and Mr. Justice Heffernan being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed or a new trial ordered, and Mr. Justice Beil-fuss, Mr. Justice Hanley, and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.

Judgment affirmed.

Connor T. Hansen, J., took no part.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. State
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 20, 1968
Citation: 163 N.W.2d 8
Docket Number: State 14
Court Abbreviation: Wis.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.