A99A1978 | Ga. Ct. App. | Feb 22, 2000

530 S.E.2d 223" court="Ga. Ct. App." date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/smith-v-state-1203388?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1203388">530 S.E.2d 223 (2000)
242 Ga. App. 459" court="Ga. Ct. App." date_filed="2000-02-22" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/smith-v-state-1203388?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1203388">242 Ga. App. 459

SMITH
v.
The STATE.

No. A99A1978.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

February 22, 2000.

Johnson, Prioleau & Kenison, Theodore Johnson, Atlanta, for appellant.

Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

MILLER, Judge.

Craig V. Smith was tried before a jury and found guilty of robbery, armed robbery, hijacking a motor vehicle, and aggravated assault. On direct appeal, he was granted a new trial due to an "illegally constituted *224 jury."[1] At a hearing on January 26, 1999, Smith moved for discharge and acquittal under OCGA § 17-7-171(b). The court twice orally denied Smith's motion, once on January 26 and again on February 2. On February 5, he filed a notice of appeal from the January 26 denial. He later filed an "amended" notice of appeal from the court's February 2 denial. But "[i]t is elementary that an oral order is not final nor appealable until and unless it is reduced to writing, signed by the judge, and filed with the clerk."[2] Because both notices of appeal are from unappealable oral orders, we dismiss the appeal in Case No. A99A1978 and remand the case to give the trial court the opportunity to enter a written order on Smith's motion for discharge and acquittal within ten days of receipt of the remittitur.

Appeal dismissed and case remanded with direction.

POPE, P.J., and SMITH, J., concur.

NOTES

[1] Smith v. State, 232 Ga. App. 458" court="Ga. Ct. App." date_filed="1998-05-05" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/smith-v-state-1414489?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1414489">232 Ga.App. 458, 460-461(1), 501 S.E.2d 622" court="Ga. Ct. App." date_filed="1998-05-05" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/smith-v-state-1414489?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1414489">501 S.E.2d 622 (1998).

[2] (Citations omitted.) Sharp v. State, 183 Ga. App. 641" court="Ga. Ct. App." date_filed="1987-07-13" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/sharp-v-state-1323493?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1323493">183 Ga. App. 641, 642(1), 360 S.E.2d 50" court="Ga. Ct. App." date_filed="1987-07-13" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/sharp-v-state-1323493?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1323493">360 S.E.2d 50 (1987); see OCGA § 5-6-31.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.