Vermont SMITH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
SALCINES, Judge.
Vermont Smith asserts that the trial court erred when it failed to appoint conflict-free counsel to represent him and summarily denied his motion to withdraw plea filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(l). We agree and reverse.
An indigent defendant has the right to court-appointed counsel to assist in filing a rule 3.170(l) motion. Padgett v. State,
In the present case, the trial court addressed the merits of Smith's pro se motion and summarily denied relief. On appeal the State urges this court to hold that it was harmless error for the trial court to have denied Smith's motion because the plea colloquy demonstrates that Smith understood the consequences of his plea. This argument is not persuasive because the issue on appeal is not whether the motion was meritorious but whether Smith was denied conflict-free counsel at a critical stage of the proceedings. See Williams v. State,
Reversed and remanded with directions.
FULMER and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.
