History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Smith
649 P.2d 1374
Nev.
1982
Check Treatment

OPINION

Per Curiam: 1

This is an appeal arising out of the property distribution in a divorce case. On July 12, 1982, respondent filed a document with this court indicating that she wished to waive the filing of an answering brief. On July 15, 1982, we ordered respondent to show cause why we should not treat her waiver as a confession of error. See NRAP 31(c). Respondent has neither filed a brief nor responded to our order to show cause.

Cause appearing, we elect to treat respondent’s conduct as a confession of error. E.g., Walport v. Walport, 98 Nev. 301, 646 P.2d 1215 (1982); Rockwell v. Rockwell, 98 Nev. 80, 640 P.2d 1318 (1982).

This case is reversed and remanded to the district court, with instructions to vacate the order of December 16, 1981.

Justice John Mowbray voluntarily disqualified himself from the consideration of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Smith
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 30, 1982
Citation: 649 P.2d 1374
Docket Number: No. 13977
Court Abbreviation: Nev.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.