History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Smith
213 Ga. 290
Ga.
1957
Check Treatment
Head, Justice.

There being in the present case no question which can properly be adjudicated without reference to the evidence, and there being no evidence in either the bill of exceptions or the transcript of the record, it will be assumed that the judgment of the court below is correct. Ingram v. Clarke, 96 Ga. 777 (22 S. E. 334); Roberts v. City of Cairo, 133 Ga. 642, 648 (66 S. E. 938); Henriot v. Henriot, 183 Ga. 510 (188 S. E. 684); Eller v. Roan & Lamb, 193 Ga. 877 (20 S. E. 2d 253); McCaskill v. Parker, 204 Ga. 398 (50 S. E. 2d 14); Attaway v. Duncan, 206 Ga. 230 (56 S. E. 2d 269); Giles v. Peachtree Pantries, 209 Ga. 536 (74 S. E. 2d 545); Rowell v. Rowell, 211 Ga. 127, 130 (84 S. E. 2d 23).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Smith
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 10, 1957
Citation: 213 Ga. 290
Docket Number: 19703
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.