History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith V. Rosebud Farmstand
1:11-cv-09147
N.D. Ill.
Sep 5, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT SMITH, )

) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 11-cv-9147 v. )

) Judge Robert M. Dow, Jr.

ROSEBUD FARMSTAND, et al. , )

) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff's motion to execute and enter memorandum of judgment [366] is denied. In the federal courts, final judgments entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 are entered on a specific form, the AO-450. See Selective Ins. Co. v. City of Paris , 769 F.3d 501, 507 (7th Cir. 2014). The final judgment in this case [339] was entered in conformity with that procedure. Execution on a money judgment is covered in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69, and the Court is not aware of any role that a "memorandum of judgment" such as that requested by Plaintiff might play in carrying out the procedures referenced in Rule 69. Notice of motion date of 9/6/2017 is stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date.

Dated: September 5, 2017

__________________________________

Robert M. Dow, Jr. United States District Judge

Case Details

Case Name: Smith V. Rosebud Farmstand
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Illinois
Date Published: Sep 5, 2017
Docket Number: 1:11-cv-09147
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.