History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Robert Marsh & Co.
138 Cal. App. 774
Cal. Ct. App.
1934
Check Treatment
HAHN, J., pro tem.

The same questions presented in this appeal are involved in the case of A. W. Burrill, as Trustee of the Estate of the United Finance Company, a Corporation, v. Robert Marsh & Co., Inc., a Corporation, and Robert Marsh, this day decided (ante, p. 101 [31 Pac. (2d) 823]). Inasmuch as counsel are the same in each case, it will serve no useful purpose to set forth in this opinion the considerations and conclusions which are dealt with in detail in the opinion filed in Burrill v. Robert Marsh & Co., Inc., and Robert Marsh. For the same reasons therein set forth the judgment in this case must be sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Craig, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on May 18, 1934.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Robert Marsh & Co.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Apr 18, 1934
Citation: 138 Cal. App. 774
Docket Number: Civ. No. 9234
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.