Smith v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.

248 Pa. 246 | Pa. | 1915

Opinion, by

Mr. Justice Elkin,

For the reasons stated'in the opinions just handed down in Windish v. Peoples Natural Gas Company, and in Pouder against same company, the contention of appellant in the present case cannot be sustained. The facts are tbe same in all essential particulars and there is no distinction-in principle between the cases.

Judgment affirmed.