History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Ooms
166 F.2d 211
D.C. Cir.
1947
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This is a suit to obtain a patent. R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. The Patent Office found that the claims lacked invention. The finding was a reasonable one. The District Court was therefore right in dismissing the bill. Abbott v. Coe, 71 App.D. C. 195, 109 F.2d 449.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Ooms
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Sep 30, 1947
Citation: 166 F.2d 211
Docket Number: No. 9399
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.