113 F. 810 | 2d Cir. | 1902
That there was an implied warranty of the seaworthiness of the vessel, and that the libelants were entitled to enforce the maritime lien, are clear, and it is unnecessary to add anything to the opinion of the court below in respect to these questions. We entertain no doubt that the decree below is correct, unless the lien wás displaced by the sale of the vessel under the decree relied upon, by the claimant, the present appellant.
The evidence shows that, immediately after the claimant became
The decree is affirmed, with interest and costs.