History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Leavenworth
235 U.S. 690
SCOTUS
1914
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Rogers v. Jones, 214 U. S. 196, 204; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672, 677; (2) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674; de Bearn v. Safe Deposit Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 670; (3) New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 344; Gring v. Ives, 222 U. S. 365, 370; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. *691652.

Mr. John W. Cutrer and Mr. O. G. Johnston for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Gerald FitzGerald and Mr. Edward Mayes for . the defendant in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Leavenworth
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 9, 1914
Citation: 235 U.S. 690
Docket Number: No. 41
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.