Smith v. JaynesSmith v. Jaynes
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- David N. Hurd
CHARLES J. SMITH Plaintiff pro se 96-A-6765 Greene Correctional Facility P.O. Box 975 Coxsackie, NY 12051
HON. LETITIA JAMES ERIK BOULE PINSONNAULT, ESQ. Attorney General for the State of New York Ass‘t Attorney General Attorney for Defendant The Capitol Albany, NY 12224
DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge
DECISION and ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Charles J. Smith brought this civil rights action pursuant to
Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See
Therefore, it is
ORDERED that
- Defendant‘s motion for summary judgment in lieu of answer is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
- Defendant is directed to answer the sole First Amendment retaliation claim in plaintiff‘s Complaint within twenty (20) days of the date of this Decision and Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge
Dated: March 9, 2020 Utica, New York.