History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Hubbard
46 Mich. 306
Mich.
1881
Check Treatment
Marston, C. J.

While we are of opinion that costs should have been awarded tbe plaintiff in error in this case, and can conceive of no reason for tbe same not having been given, let alone giving of costs against him as was done, yet within tbe rule in Hewitt v. Ingham Circuit Judge 44 Mich. 153, we cannot review tbe discretion of tbe circuit judge even although we may think no discretion was exercised.

Tbe judgment will be affirmed with costs.

Tbe other Justices concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Hubbard
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 22, 1881
Citation: 46 Mich. 306
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.