History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Harmon
32 Minn. 312
Minn.
1884
Check Treatment
Gilfillan, C. J.

The application to set aside the judgment and for leave to answer was addressed to the discretion of the court below. There is no pretence for saying that there was any abuse of discretion, and the order appealed from must be affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Harmon
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jul 18, 1884
Citation: 32 Minn. 312
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.