midpage

Smith v. FloridaSmith v. Florida

Supreme Court of the United States
Feb 24, 1972
70-5055
Versions:405 U.S. 172
92 S. Ct. 848
31 L. Ed. 2d 122
1972 U.S. LEXIS 85
Mr. Justice Douglas

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Florida’s vagrancy statute 1 includes in the term “vagrants,” who can be criminally charged and convicted, “persons wandering or strolling around from place to place without any lawful purpose or object.” 2 The defendants were so charged and pleaded not guilty, waived trial by jury, and were tried by a judge, who denied a motion to dismiss. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed, two judges dissenting. 239 So. 2d 250. The *173 case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted. 403 U. S. 917.

We have this day decided Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, ante, p. 156. We therefore vacate and remand the judgment in the instant case for reconsideration in light of Papachristou.

So ordered.

Mr. Justice Powell and Mr. Justice Rehnquist took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Notes

1

Fla. Stat. §856.02 (1965). See Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, decided this day, ante, at 157 n. 2.

2

§ 856.02.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Florida
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 24, 1972
Citations: 405 U.S. 172; 92 S. Ct. 848; 31 L. Ed. 2d 122; 1972 U.S. LEXIS 85; 70-5055
Docket Number: 70-5055
Court Abbreviation: U.S.
Log In