History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Drake
125 Pa. 501
Pa.
1889
Check Treatment
Per Curiam*

We are not satisfied that the evidence in this case would have warranted the jury in rendering a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. For reasons given by the learned president of the court below tlierg was no error in entering the judgment of nonsuit and afterwards refusing to take it off.

J udgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Drake
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 15, 1889
Citation: 125 Pa. 501
Docket Number: No. 133
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.