History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Culpepper
33 S.E. 49
Ga.
1899
Check Treatment
Cobb, J.

It was, upon the trial of an action upon a promissory note given for the purchase of a mule and on its face reserving in the seller the title to the property until paid for, erroneous to strike a plea alleging that the mule had died without any fault or negligence on the part of the defendant, and praying for a rescission of the contract of sale; there being no stipulation therein that the purchaser was to be liable in case the mule died. Civil Code, $ 3543. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring. Complaint. Before, Judge Reese. Taliaferro superior court. February term, 1898. Horace M. Holden, for plaintiff in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Culpepper
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 20, 1899
Citation: 33 S.E. 49
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.