Smith v. Craig
13 Ind. 529
Ind.1859Check TreatmentSuit on a note. Answer, that the note was given for a part of the consideration of land, and that plaintiff had no title thereto, &c. Reply, general denial. Motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, overruled. Judgment for plaintiff
The only point made in the brief of appellant is, as to the jurisdiction of the Court. This question has been already decided. Harvey v. Dakin, 12 Ind. R. 481.
The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.