Smith v. Cochran, 173 Ga. 162

Smith v. Cochran

173 Ga. 162 | Ga. | 1931

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the pleadings and the evidence, the judge, to whom the ease was submitted for decision without the intervention of a jury, did not err in finding for the defendant and rendering the judgment to which exception is taken.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Sines, J., who dissents, and Gilbert, J., absent.

Dissenting Opinion

Hines, J.

dissenting. See Anderson v. Goodwin, 125 Ga. 663, 670 (54 S. E. 679), and cases cited in Smith v. Bennett, ante, 159.

C. W. Foy, for plaintiff. Homer Beeland, for defendant.