35 Neb. 46 | Neb. | 1892
The facts in this case are fully stated in the opinion previously filed, 29 Neb., 76. 'At the time of the filing of that opinion the conclusion was reached by the court that the order of the district court discharging .the attachment was not sustained by the evidence and that the .judgment should be reversed. A rehearing was subsequently allowed, and, with the assistance of additional briefs, has been again considered.
. It is not necessary to discuss the question of the validity of the mortgages to Holland and the First National Bank
The motion to discharge raised a question of fact to be determined by the district judge, and his finding thereon should not be disturbed unless clearly against the weight
Affirmed.