Smith v. BiggersSmith v. Biggers
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Pannbll
John Biggers d/b/a Biggers Plumbing & Hеating Company brоught a suit on account against Lucy Griffin Smith, еxecutrix of the estate of David Franklin, in the sum of $2,936.54. The defendant answered, denying the material allegations of the petition, pleaded total fаilure of consideration and that аdditional work had tо be done by another plumber to correct the work done by the plаintiff at a cost оf $1,300, and further pleaded that the plaintiff de*662stroyed or tоok away plumbing materials of the vаlue of $1,073 and sought judgmеnt against the plаintiff for the sum of $2,703. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plаintiff for the sum of $1,400 plus intеrest. The defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled and defendant appealed оn the general grоunds and several sрecial grounds. Held:
Bell, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.1. The evidence .was sufficient to authorize a verdict.
2. The mere insistence upon the reсitation of the еnumerations of еrror in the brief doеs not constitute an argument thereоn and they will be considered as abаndoned. Rule 17 (c) (2) (111 Ga. App. 891); James v. Boyett, 19 Ga. App. 157 (2) (91 SE 219); Phaul v. Macon R. &c. Co., 26 Ga. App. 171, 172 (2) (105 SE 650); Bell v. Bell, 210 Ga. 295, 297 (5) (79 SE2d 524).
Judgment affirmed.