Smith v. Batesville Security Bank, 222 Miss. 38

Smith v. Batesville Security Bank

222 Miss. 38

Miss.

1954

Check Treatment

Hall, J.

This case presents a disputed question of fact which was resolved by the chancellor in favor of appellee. There was evidence sufficient to support a decree for either party. We have carefully considered the whole record and we are unable to say that the decision of the lower court was manifestly wrong or against the *42great weight of the evidence. Therefore, under our decisions, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

"McGehee, O. J., and Kyle, Holmes and Gillespie, JJ., concur.