Smith v. A.B.K. Apartments, Inc.Smith v. A.B.K. Apartments, Inc.
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant A.B.K. Apartments, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated July 20, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff tripped over the edge of a four-foot square depression, allegedly 3A to one-inch deep, designed to hold a mat on the floor in the vestibule of the apartment building where he lived. At the time of the incident the mat allegedly had been missing for years. The appellant moved for summary judgment, inter alia, on the ground that the depression in the floor did not constitute a dangerous or defective condition as a matter of law because it was trivial, not a trap or nuisance, and was open and obvious.
Under the circumstances of this case, there exists a triable issue of fact as to whether the depression in the floor, without a mat, constituted a dangerous or defective condition (see, Trincere v County of Suffolk,