Smith Motor Car Co. v. Universal Credit Co.
168 S.E. 19
Ga. Ct. App.
1933
Check Treatment
Jenkins, P. J.

Under the answer returned by the Supreme Court to the question certified to it in this case (176 Ga. 565, 168 S. E. 18), the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and the judge erred in directing a verdict in its favor.

Judgment reversed.

Stephens <md Sutton, JJ., concur.