In an action by an employee of the defendant under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., the jury found in his favor and awarded damages of $45,000.00. Defendant’s ° ! . , , . . , “otlon fo1* a ^ was demed and this aWeal followed-
The issues presented are whether certa“ “edical testimony was properly admitted and whether the District Court properly charged the jury with respect ^ .£u£ure mediCal and hospital expenses.
On review of the record we find no Basic or prejudicial error in the admis-gjon 0f -¿he medical testimony complained of or in the District Court’s instructions to the jury with respect to future medical and hospital expenses,
The Order of the District Court,