History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith, Barry & Co. v. Bearden
117 Ga. 822
Ga.
1903
Check Treatment
Eisii, J.

An entry made by a proper officer upon an execution issued from a judgment rendered in 'a justice’s court, unless recorded upon the execution docket of the superior court of the county where the defendant resides, will not, even as between the parties to the judgment, arrest the running of the dormancy statute. Civil Code, §§ 3761, 3762; Nowell v. Haire, 116 Ga. 386.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Affidavit of illegality. Before W. S. Upshaw, judge pro hac vice. Morgan superior court. September 1, 1902. . J. R. Rolland, for plaintiffs. George <& Anderson, for defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Smith, Barry & Co. v. Bearden
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 27, 1903
Citation: 117 Ga. 822
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.