Smedes v. Hooghtaling
3 Cai. Cas. 48 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1805
Fer curiam, delivered by
This case is submitted without argument. On a review of all the decisions on this sübject, the court think this rule ought to be adopted. That interest is recoverable beyond the penalty of a bond. But that the recovery depends on principles pf law, and is not an arbitrary, fid libitum discretion of a jury. In the present instance, we are of opinipn, that it is due, and therefore, the verdict to remain unaltered.