History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smartire Systems, Inc. v. Siemens VDO Automotive Corp.
1:07-cv-00932
E.D. Va.
Mar 18, 2008
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Case 1:07-cv-00932-LMB-TCB Document 105 Filed 03/18/08 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 1355

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division SMARTIRE SYSTEMS, INC., )

) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:07cv932

) SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CORP., )

et al., ) )

Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION THIS MATTER came before the Court for in camera inspection of documents BPN 11-EPN 13, BPN 14-EPN 16, BPN 56-EPN 57, BPN 61, BPN 62, BPN 63-EPN 70, and BPN 71-EPN 73. The Court understands that defendant withdrew its claim of privilege with regard to BPN 17- EPN 21 and that document will be produced to plaintiff; BPN 58-EPN 60 and BPN 74-EPN 83 have already been produced.

UPON REVIEW of the privilege log, unredacted documents, and other materials submitted at the direction of the Court, the Court finds that all of the redacted portions of the documents reflect privileged attorney-client information and advice. It is therefore ORDERED that the unredacted portions of these documents need not be produced.

An appropriate Order shall issue.

ENTERED this 18th day of March, 2008.

/s/ THERESA CARROLL BUCHANAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Alexandria, Virginia

Case Details

Case Name: Smartire Systems, Inc. v. Siemens VDO Automotive Corp.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Virginia
Date Published: Mar 18, 2008
Docket Number: 1:07-cv-00932
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Va.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.