History
  • No items yet
midpage
955 So. 2d 270
La. Ct. App.
2007
AMY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Gene Smart, et al. v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell, et al., 06-1414 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/4/07), 955 So.2d 263, 2007 WL 983222 the trial court’s judgment denying the exceptions of vagueness and improper cumulation of actions filed on behalf of J. Ogden Middleton is reversed. This matter is remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter judgment granting the exception of vagueness in compliance with La.Code Civ.P. art. 933(B) and to reserve consideration of the exception of improper cumulation of actions until the pleadings contain sufficient facts to assess the causes of action alleged. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to the respondents, Gene Smart and Priscilla Babin.

WRIT GRANTED. DENIAL OF EXCEPTIONS OF VAGUENESS AND IMPROPER CUMULATION OF ACTIONS REVERSED. REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Case Details

Case Name: Smart v. Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Apr 4, 2007
Citations: 955 So. 2d 270; 2007 La. App. LEXIS 661; 6 La.App. 3 Cir. 1331; 2007 WL 983212; No. 06-1331
Docket Number: No. 06-1331
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In