History
  • No items yet
midpage
Small v. Jones
1915 Ga. LEXIS 374
Ga.
1915
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

There was evidence to support the verdict in favor of the plaintiff. None of the grounds relied on by the movant show any error against the defendant, requiring a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, (7- J-, absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Small v. Jones
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 25, 1915
Citation: 1915 Ga. LEXIS 374
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.