History
  • No items yet
midpage
Small v. Benfield
20 A. 284
N.H.
1890
Check Treatment

The plaintiff has a direct remedy for the error in the taxation of costs. Bedel v. Goodall, 26 N.H. 92; Chamberlain v. Sterling, 26 N.H. 115; McIntire v. Carr, 59 N.H. 207; Abbot v. Renaud, 64 N.H. 89; Bean v. Savings Bank, 64 N.H. 350. The judgment, though erroneous, is not void. It cannot be impeached collaterally, and, until it is reversed or set aside, justifies all acts done under its authority. Fowler v. Brooks, 64 N.H. 423, and cases cited; Carr v. Sterling, 114 N.Y. 558.

The defendant is not responsible for the officer's demand and receipt of illegal fees. He had no control over, interest in, or (so far as appears) knowledge of the officer's charges, and gave no directions in regard to them. In making them the officer was not his agent, and is alone answerable for their legality. G. L., c. 290, s. 27; Burnham v. Aiken, 6 N.H. 306,323; Odiorne v. Mason, 9 N.H. 24, 30; Wells v. Burbank, 17 N.H. 393, 407; Avery v. Bowman, 40 N.H. 453, 457.

Judgment for the defendant.

CLARK, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 207

Case Details

Case Name: Small v. Benfield
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1890
Citation: 20 A. 284
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.