History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sloan v. Kubitsky
728 A.2d 1095
Conn.
1999
Check Treatment

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was granted improvidently.1

The appeal is dismissed.

Notes

We granted the petition of the defendant Edward J. Winter for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court; Sloan v. Kubitsky, 48 Conn. App. 835, 712 A.2d 966 (1998); limited to the following issue: “Whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the trial court’s decision precluding the guarantor from asserting the defense of recoupment.” Sloan v. Kubitsky, 247 Conn. 901, 719 A.2d 904 (1998).

Case Details

Case Name: Sloan v. Kubitsky
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: May 18, 1999
Citation: 728 A.2d 1095
Docket Number: SC 15999
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In