History
  • No items yet
midpage
Slifka v. Viettie
110 Colo. 138
Colo.
1942
Check Treatment

THIS matter is before us on an application for supersedeas which is accompanied by a request for oral argument on the hearing of the application.

Examining the record, we find that the last court order is merely one sustaining the motion of defendant Pete Viettie, "To dismiss the action because the amended complaint fails to state a claim against defendant upon which relief can be granted." In the same order *Page 139 plaintiff was granted fifteen days to elect between stated alternatives. The record does not disclose any election or the entry of a final order of dismissal; consequently under rule 111 (a) (1) of our Rules of Civil Procedure, the record before us does not present a "matter reviewable" for our consideration.

Writ of error dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Slifka v. Viettie
Court Name: Supreme Court of Colorado
Date Published: Nov 9, 1942
Citation: 110 Colo. 138
Docket Number: No. 15,214.
Court Abbreviation: Colo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.