60 N.H. 201 | N.H. | 1880
Baldwin once owned the premises in question. His line extended to the river, "thence on the river," etc. This gave him the soil to the thread of the stream. State v. Gilmanton,
These views are not controverted, but the defendants contend that the clause in the deed from Baldwin to Reeves and from Reeves to the plaintiff, "thence north-easterly on the river shore," limits and restricts the grant to the bank or shore of the river. In Woodman v. Spencer,
The evidence as to the agreement between Baldwin and Reeves tended to contradict the deed, and was properly excluded. Goodeno v. Hutchinson,
Judgment on the report for the plaintiff for $400.
FOSTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *203