Slaven v. Hellman, 24 Neb. 646

Slaven v. Hellman

24 Neb. 646 | Neb. | 1888

Maxwell, J.

On the 21st of July, 1887, the defendant in error brought an action against the plaintiff, before a justice of’ the peace of Douglas county, to recover the sum of $39 and interest. The cause was set for hearing July 26,1887,. *647at 1 o’clock p.m., at which time and for one hour thereafter the plaintiff in error failed to appear, whereupon the justice having heard the testimony offered by the defendant in error, rendered judgment as prayed in the bill of particulars. The plaintiff in error, on the 3d day of August thereafter, filed an undertaking for an appeal to the district court, which was duly approved by the justice. The appellant failed to file a transcript of the proceedings in the district court within 30 days next after the rendition of the judgment. The defendant in error thereupon filed a motion to' dismiss the appeal. This motion was afterwards withdrawn, and on motion of the defendant in error a judgment was entered as follows: “ This day came the said plaintiffs and produced to the court a transcript of the proceedings and judgment of Gustave Anderson, a justice of the peace in and for Douglas county, in this action, from which it appears that on the 26th day of July, 1887, a judgment was rendered by said justice in favor of these plaintiffs and against this defendant for the sum of $59.05 and $8.50 costs of suit, from which judgment the said defendant appealed. And it appearing to the court that the appellant has failed to deliver said transcript and proceedings to the clerk of this court and cause his appeal to be docketed within the time required by law, and the said M. Heilman & Co. now here electing to have judgment entered in this court, it is therefore considered by the court that the said M. Heilman & Co. recover from the said Owen Slaven the sum of $59.05, the judgment, and $8.50, costs of suit, as aforesaid, with interest from the 26th day of July, 1887, together with their costs in this court expended, taxed at $......, and execution is awarded therefor.”

Section 1008 provides: “ That the said justice shall make out a certified transcript of his proceedings, including the undertaking taken for such appeal, and shall, on demand, deliver the same to the appellant or his agent, who shall deliver the same to the clerk of the court to *648which such appeal may be taken, within thirty days next following the rendition of such judgment,” etc.

Section 1011 authorizes the appellee, in case the appellant fails to file a transcript within thirty days, to file a transcript and have the cause placed on the docket; and the court is authorized either to enter up judgment in favor of the appellee, or with the consent of the appellee may dismiss the appeal. The court, therefore, in rendering judgment in this case, acted within the powers conferred by the statute, and the judgment is valid. If the appellant desired to vacate the judgment and file an answer, or sought other relief, or to try the cause, he should have applied to the district court, but the record fails to show that he made such application.

So far as appears the plaintiff has no defense to the action. He permitted a judgment to be taken against him by default before the justice, and so far as appears would make no defense in the district court, so that if a new trial was granted the same judgment with additional costs and interest would be rendered. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.