126 So. 386 | Fla. | 1930
The orders herein appealed from were reversed, Skipper v. Handley, 121 So. R. 792, but a rehearing was granted. Upon further consideration the Court has determined that notwithstanding the contention as to the effect of the supplemental agreement referred to in the former opinion, the facts alleged in this case bring it within the rules announced in Chubb v. Chadwick,
TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, STRUM AND BROWN, J. J., concur.
ELLIS AND BUFORD, J. J., dissent.
