History
  • No items yet
midpage
Skinner v. State
470 So. 2d 702
Fla.
1985
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction because of direct and express conflict between the case here, Skinner v. State, 450 So.2d 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), and Golden v. State, 120 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). Since that time the First District Court of Appeal has receded from Golden and expressly adopted the reasoning of the case here, Skinner, and Ballard v. State, 447 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). See Carter v. State, 469 So.2d 775 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), panel decision adopted by court en banc April 25, 1985. The conflict having been resolved while this cause has been pending, we exercise our discretion to decline to proceed further and deny review.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Skinner v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: May 30, 1985
Citation: 470 So. 2d 702
Docket Number: No. 65510
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.