History
  • No items yet
midpage
Skinner v. Rhodes
162 F. Supp. 785
D. Del.
1958
Check Treatment
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

On May 9, 1958 the petitioner, Robert K. Skinner, filed a petition praying for an issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Thereafter an answer was filed by the respondents alleging this court lacked jurisdiction because the petitioner had an adequate remedy in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware pursuant to Rule 35 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure of the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Del.C.Ann.

An examination of the petition filed herein discloses that it is defective on its face, since the petitioner does not aver an exhaustion of state remedies.1 Rule 35 of the Delaware Rules of Criminal Procedure was promulgated for the purpose of affording the courts of the State of Delaware the opportunity to grant, in proper eases, the relief the petitioner seeks here.

Until the petitioner avails himself of the opportunity afforded by the laws and rules of the courts of the State of Delaware for a hearing of the issues raised, this court is without authority to consider the petition.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.

An order will be prepared and signed by the court in conformity herewith.

. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254.

Case Details

Case Name: Skinner v. Rhodes
Court Name: District Court, D. Delaware
Date Published: Jun 6, 1958
Citation: 162 F. Supp. 785
Docket Number: No. 14
Court Abbreviation: D. Del.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.