History
  • No items yet
midpage
Siter, James & Co.'s Appeal
26 Pa. 178
Pa.
1856
Check Treatment

*184The opinion of the court was delivered by

Woodward, J.

The learned arid able argument of, the appellants’ counsel has failed to shake the conclusions of the auditor, and we adopt them, with the reasons given by the auditor, as the law of this case.

The decree of distribution is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Siter, James & Co.'s Appeal
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 1, 1856
Citation: 26 Pa. 178
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.