History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sitar v. State
548 So. 2d 1115
Fla.
1989
Check Treatment
KOGAN, Judge.

We have for review Sitar v. State, 530 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), based on express and direct conflict with State v. McGriff, 537 So.2d 107 (Fla.1989). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The district court in this case directly relied on its prior opinion in Abt v. State, 528 So.2d 112 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), which subsequently has been quashed by this Court. Abt v. State, 541 So.2d 614 (Fla.1989) (citing McGriff). Accordingly, we quash the opinion below and remand for reconsideration in light of this Court’s holdings in McGriff and Abt.

It is so ordered.

*1116EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, SHAW, BARKETT and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Sitar v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Sep 21, 1989
Citation: 548 So. 2d 1115
Docket Number: No. 73191
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.