Siroky v. State

Oct 20, 1988
No. 87-1912
Reporters:
, , ,
Before:
Cobb
COBB, Judge.

The appellant, Leo Siroky, contends that the trial court, through scrivener’s ‍​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‍error, entered a written order which did not conform to the court’s oral pronouncement at the time of sentencing. The judge verbally ‍​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‍indicated his intention to impose a special condition of community control, i.e., that defendant have only supervised contact with his children; instead, the written order ‍​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‍subsequently entered prohibited all association with the children. The state concedes this necessity for correction. The appeal is otherwise without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm, but ‍​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‍remand this cause to the trial court for the purpose of conforming the written order to the verbal pronouncement pursuant to Cahill v. ‍​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‍State, 526 So.2d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.