History
  • No items yet
midpage
Singleton v. State
227 S.E.2d 472
Ga. Ct. App.
1976
Check Treatment
Webb, Judge.

1. A motion to suppress evidence which is made orally is procedurally defective and a denial thereof is authorized. Code Ann. § 27-313 (b); Graves v. State, 135 Ga. App. 921 (219 SE2d 633).

2. Appellant complains of a portion of the district attorney’s closing argument. However, no objection was made at trial, and no reversible error appears. Gerdine v. State, 136 Ga. App. 561, 562 (3) (222 SE2d 128).

3. The evidence authorized the guilty verdict, and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Singleton v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 20, 1976
Citation: 227 S.E.2d 472
Docket Number: 52182
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In