Singleton v. State
227 S.E.2d 472
Ga. Ct. App.1976Check Treatment
1. A motion to suppress evidence which is made orally is procedurally defective and a denial thereof is authorized. Code Ann. § 27-313 (b);
Graves v. State,
2. Appellant complains of a portion of the district attorney’s closing argument. However, no objection was made at trial, and no reversible error appears.
Gerdine v. State,
3. The evidence authorized the guilty verdict, and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
