History
  • No items yet
midpage
Singleton v. Hiatt
173 F.2d 899
5th Cir.
1949
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined each and every contention raised by petitioner in his application for the writ of habeas corpus and find them, without exception, wholly without support or foundation in the record and totally lacking in merit. It follows that the judgment of the district court discharging the writ and remanding petitioner into the custody of appellee should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.1

Riddle v. Dyche, 262 U.S. 333, 336, 43 S.Ct. 555, 67 L.Ed. 1009; Telfian v. Sanford, 5 Cir., 161 F.2d 556; Reaves v. Ainsworth, 219 U.S. 296, 31 S.Ct. 230, 55 L.Ed. 225; Altmayer v. Sanford, 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 161; Strong v. Huff, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 89, 148 F.2d 692.

Case Details

Case Name: Singleton v. Hiatt
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 20, 1949
Citation: 173 F.2d 899
Docket Number: No. 12566
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.