History
  • No items yet
midpage
Singh v. Allied Collection Services, Inc.
1:20-cv-01161
E.D. Cal.
Dec 15, 2020
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 1:20-cv-01161-DAD-SKO Document 15 Filed 12/15/20 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GURPREET G. SINGH, Case No. 1:20-cv-01161-NONE-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND v. CLOSE THE CASE ALLIED COLLECTION SERVICES, (Doc. 14) INC.,

Defendant.

On December 12, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation, signed by all parties who have appeared, that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 14.)

In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows:

[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41 thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all the parties who have appeared, although an oral stipulation in open court will also suffice. See Eitel v. McCool , 782 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 (9th Cir. 1986).

*2 Case 1:20-cv-01161-DAD-SKO Document 15 Filed 12/15/20 Page 2 of 2 Once the stipulation between the parties who have appeared is properly filed or made in open court, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal. Case law concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval. Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co. , 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999). Because the parties have filed a stipulation for dismissal of this case with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that is signed by all whom have made an appearance, this case has terminated. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL assign a district judge to this matter and thereafter CLOSE the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Sheila K. Oberto .

Dated: December 14, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case Details

Case Name: Singh v. Allied Collection Services, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Dec 15, 2020
Docket Number: 1:20-cv-01161
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.