Singer v. SeaveySinger v. Seavey
Defendants did not waive their right to arbitrate by moving to dismiss the complaint and appealing from the partial denial of the motion (see Flynn v Labor Ready, 6 AD3d 492 [2004]). Nor, since defendants made their demand for arbitration before serving their answer, did they waive the right by asserting the cross claim (see City Trade & Indus., Ltd. v New Cent. Jute Mills Co., 25 NY2d 49, 55 [1969]).
In light of this determination, we dismiss the appeal from the first order as academic. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, McGuire, Renwick and Richter, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2009 NY Slip Op 31302(U).]