Singer v. 3675 Bird Road, Inc., 543 So. 2d 1320

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s entry of final summary judgment. The criminal attack on appellants was not foreseeable; thus, as a matter of law, appellees had no duty to take steps to prevent its occurrence. See Lomillo v. Howard Johnsons Co., 471 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Admiral’s Port Condominium Assoc., Inc. v. Feldman, 426 So.2d 1054 (Fla.3d DCA), review denied, 434 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983); Chateloin v. Flanigan’s Enter., Inc., 423 So.2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Badillo v. DeVivo, 161 Ill.App.3d 596, 113 Ill.Dec. 696, 515 N.E.2d 681, appeal denied, 117 Ill.2d 541, 115 Ill.Dec. 397, 517 N.E.2d 1083 (1987).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Singer v. 3675 Bird Road, Inc.

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Jun 6, 1989

Citations: 543 So. 2d 1320; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1371; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3198; 1989 WL 59938; No. 88-2750

Docket Number: No. 88-2750

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.