1 Blackf. 229 | Ind. | 1822
After the return of a domestic attachment, the defendants moved the Circuit Court to dismiss the attachment, because the attachment bond was not indorsed by the clerk as having been taken by him in his office, and by him approved of
The decision of the Circuit Court is incorrect. The place where the bond was taken, the approval of the bond and surety, and the filing of the bond and affidavit, are matters of fact, which, so far as they are required to be shown, may appear on the face of the papers, or be proved in any other way. See Averil v. Dickerson, December term, 1817
The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Ante, p. 3. — Woodburn v. Fleming, ante, p. 4.