History
  • No items yet
midpage
Simmons v. State
136 S.E. 330
Ga. Ct. App.
1927
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

“Upon the trial of one charged, with assault with intent to rape, where the undisputed evidence shows that if any offense was committed, it was either assault with intent to rape or assault and battery, a verdict finding the defendant guilty of a mere assault is contrary to the law and the evidence.” Fronebarger v. State, 27 Ga. App. 607 (109 S. E. 512), and cases cited. The foregoing being controlling, it is not necessary to discuss the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness. Francis B. Hunter, for plaintiff in error. John C. Hollingsworth, solicitor-general, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Simmons v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 11, 1927
Citation: 136 S.E. 330
Docket Number: 17777
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.