Sime v. GoordSime v. Goord
Versions:30 A.D.3d 887817 N.Y.S.2d 733
inner_thought
* Task: Convert a legal document (PDF/OCR images) to semantic HTML.
* Input: 3 pages of a New York Appellate Division reporter (pages 887, 888, 889).
* Content:
* Page 887: Conclusion of one case (Workers’ Compensation Board case, involving Crew III, J.P. et al.).
* Page 887-889: A new case: *In the Matter of Alex Sime v. Glenn S. Goord*.
* Page 889: Start of another case (*People v. Damon Flagg*).
* Requirement: “If the document contains multiple opinions... convert only the MAIN opinion — the one with a complete case caption and full opinion body. Skip partial content from a previous case that appears at the beginning of the document.”
* Main case to convert: *In the Matter of Alex Sime, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.*
* Case Metadata for *Sime v. Goord*:
* Case Name: In the Matter of Alex Sime, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
* Short Name: Sime v. Goord
* Docket/Citation: 28 AD3d 886 (mentioned in text), 817 NYS2d 733 (reporter cite), 28 AD3d 887 (page number in reporter).
* Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division (Third Department - inferred from reporter/judges).
* Date: June 26, 2006 (for the caption) / Opinion body mentions a decision substituted for one from April 13, 2006. The header/date provided on page 887 is “June 26, 2006“.
* Judges: Rumsey, J. (Supreme Court), Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ. (Appellate Division).
* Page 887:
* Top part is the end of another case. Skip.
* Marker: `(June 26, 2006)`
* Caption: `In the Matter of Alex Sime, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent. [817 NYS2d 733]—`
* Page starts here: `887`.
* Page 888:
* Text starts: `Motion for reargument...`
* Paragraph 1: Motion granted, April 13, 2006 decision vacated.
* Paragraph 2: Appeal from Supreme Court (Rumsey, J.).
* Paragraph 3: “Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report...”
* Paragraph 4: “We reject petitioner‘s contention...”
* Page starts here: `888`.
* Page 889:
* Text continues from page 888: `information, a review of the in camera information...`
* Paragraph 2: Concurrence/Conclusion: `Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.`
* Below that: `(June 29, 2006)` and start of another case. Skip those.
* `shortName`: Sime v. Goord
* `docket`: unknown (not explicitly given as a number, but citations are provided).
* `court`: N.Y. App. Div. (or N.Y. Sup. Ct. App. Div.).
* `date`: 2006-06-26
* `citation`: 817 N.Y.S.2d 733 | 28 A.D.3d 887
* *Case Citations:*
* 28 AD3d 886 [2006] (vacated)
* 7 NYCRR 254.1 (law)
* Matter of Giakoumelos v Coughlin, 192 AD2d 998, 998 [1993]
* lv denied 82 NY2d 658 [1993]
* Matter of Berry v Portuondo, 6 AD3d 848, 849 [2004]
* Matter of Simpson v Goord, 308 AD2d 641, 642 [2003]
* lv denied 2 NY3d 704 [2004]
* Matter of Garrett v Goord, 14 AD3d 826, 828 [2005]
* Matter of McClean v Coombe, 242 AD2d 846, 847 [1997]
* *Law Citations:*
* CPLR article 78
* 7 NYCRR 254.1
* Skip previous case text on page 887.
* Page 887 starts the *Sime* case.
* Page 888 contains the bulk.
* Page 889 concludes the case.
*Self-Correction on Citations:*
* `Matter of Giakoumelos v Cough- of [1993]). lin, 192 AD2d 998, 998 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 658` is a mess in OCR.
* The text is: `see Matter of Giakoumelos v Coughlin, 192 AD2d 998, 998 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 658 [1993]`.
* Actually, let‘s look at the screenshot for page 888.
* `see Matter of Giakoumelos v Cough-lin, 192 AD2d 998, 998 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 658 [1993]`.
* Note: The OCR for that specific section is `seeMatter Giakoumelos v Cough- of [1993]). lin, 192 AD2d 998, 998 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 658`. I must follow the screenshot text: “see Matter of Giakoumelos v Coughlin, 192 AD2d 998, 998 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 658 [1993]“.
*Page break check:*
* End of 887: `[817 NYS2d 733]—`
* Start of 888: `Motion for reargument.`
* End of 888: `To the extent that petitioner challenges the use of confidential`
* Start of 889: `information, a review of the in camera information...`
*Short Name:* Sime v. Goord.
*Court:* N.Y. App. Div. (Appellate Division, Third Department).
*Date:* June 26, 2006.
* CPLR article 78 -> `jurisdiction=“NY” cite=“N.Y. C.P.L.R. 78“` (Actually, usually cited as Article 78, but normalize to N.Y. C.P.L.R. Art. 78 or similar). The instructions say normalize. `N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 7801` is the start, but “Article 78” is the common law citation. I‘ll use `N.Y. C.P.L.R. Art. 78`.
* 7 NYCRR 254.1 -> `jurisdiction=“NY” cite=“7 N.Y.C.R.R. 254.1“`.
*Case Citations Detail:*
* `Matter of Giakoumelos v Coughlin, 192 AD2d 998, 998 [1993]` -> `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`.
* `lv denied 82 NY2d 658 [1993]` -> `court=“N.Y.“` (Court of Appeals).
* `Matter of Berry v Portuondo, 6 AD3d 848, 849 [2004]` -> `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`.
* `Matter of Simpson v Goord, 308 AD2d 641, 642 [2003]` -> `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`.
* `lv denied 2 NY3d 704 [2004]` -> `court=“N.Y.“`.
* `Matter of Garrett v Goord, 14 AD3d 826, 828 [2005]` -> `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`.
* `Matter of McClean v Coombe, 242 AD2d 846, 847 [1997]` -> `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`.
*Reflow Word Check:*
* “cross-\nexamine” (p 887, top - irrelevant as it‘s skipped).
* “car-\nrier” (p 887, middle - irrelevant as it‘s skipped).
* “re-\nvealed” (p 887, middle - irrelevant).
* “mem-\norandum” (p 888) -> “memorandum“.
* “or-\nder” (p 888) -> “order“.
* “informa-\ntion” (p 888) -> “information“.
* “disciplinary\nhearing” (no hyphen).
* “com-\nmenced” (p 888) -> “commenced“.
* “Secu-\nrity” (p 888) -> “Security“.
* “petition-\ner‘s” (p 888) -> “petitioner‘s“.
* “Cough-\nlin” (p 888) -> “Coughlin“.
*Quotes:*
Check for curly vs straight. OCR often provides straight or curly. I must use straight.
*Final check of metadata:*
Case: In the Matter of Alex Sime, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Citation: 817 NYS2d 733. (Also found in 28 AD3d 887).
*Wait:* On page 887, the date “(June 26, 2006)” appears *above* the caption.
On page 889, another date “(June 29, 2006)” appears below the conclusion of Sime. This suggests Sime was decided on June 26, and the next case was June 29.
*One detail:* The text mentions “the memorandum and order decided and entered April 13, 2006... is vacated and the following memorandum and order is substituted therefor“. The final decision date is likely June 26, 2006.
Let‘s produce the HTML.
- `midpage-case-name`: In the Matter of Alex Sime, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent. `shortName=“Sime v. Goord“`
- `midpage-citation`: 28 A.D.3d 887 | 817 N.Y.S.2d 733
- `midpage-court`: N.Y. App. Div. (Third Department isn‘t explicitly on the page but standard for AD3d). I will use `court=“N.Y. App. Div.“`.
- `midpage-date`: June 26, 2006. `date=“2006-06-26“`
Page 887 ends with: `[817 NYS2d 733]—`
Page 888 begins with: `Motion for reargument. ...`
I will place `