| Ga. | Nov 15, 1911
1. An alleged statement of facts not being set forth in the bill of exceptions nor made a part of the same as an exhibit thereto and properly authenticated, what purports to be an agreed statement of facts sent up as a part of the record, but not approved by the judge and ordered filed as such, can not be considered by this court. Robinson v. Woodward, 134 Ga. 777 (68 S.E. 553" date_filed="1910-07-13" court="Ga." case_name="Robinson v. Woodward">68 S. E. 553); Blackman v. Garrett, 135 Ga. 226 (69 S.E. 110" date_filed="1910-10-11" court="Ga." case_name="Fender v. Shaw">69 S. E. 110).
'2. The errors assigned in the bill of exceptions being such as can not be determined from the record without a consideration of such alleged agreed statement of facts so sent up, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. Ib.
•3. The act of 1911, page 149, § 3, is applicable, according to its terms, exclusively to motions for new trial, and is not applicable to this case, wherein there was no motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.